Openbsd vs freebsd performance

Imperva waf

Jul 03, 2007 · The PF (packet filter) firewall package was introduced in OpenBSD 3.0, and has since been ported to the FreeBSD and NetBSD Operating Systems. PF contains a stateful packet inspection engine, the ability to replicate state information to a backup firewall, a flexible self optimizing rule engine, QOS support, and the ability to collect performance metrics. What is your opinion on OpenBSD .vs FreeBSD for web, database (MySQL and PostgreSQL), mail, DNS and other types of servers? ... You will probably find some performance advantages with FreeBSD ... See full list on itsfoss.com Aug 28, 2009 · The -t option triggers a simple and rather naive benchmark of the disks seek and transfer performance, enter: # diskinfo -t /dev/aacd0 Sample Outputs: /dev/aacd0 512 # sectorsize 299573968896 # mediasize in bytes (279G) 585105408 # mediasize in sectors 36421 # Cylinders according to firmware. FreeBSD: the community is more open to ideas and questions to which anybody will probably always get a response. If you have a general question, you can send an email to the addresses listed at www.freebsd.org website. OpenBSD: the community (www.openbsd.org) is closed, uncommunicative; some people say that it does not like questions. Better performance - OpenBSD outperforms Solaris on older uniproc machines ... but it IS a chop job, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, Solaris, and Win2k are the only OS's I've examined that I really consider ... What is your opinion on OpenBSD .vs FreeBSD for web, database (MySQL and PostgreSQL), mail, DNS and other types of servers? ... You will probably find some performance advantages with FreeBSD ... The three most notable descendants in current use are FreeBSD, OpenBSD, and NetBSD, which are all derived from 386BSD and 4.4BSD-Lite, by various routes. Both NetBSD and FreeBSD started life in 1993, initially derived from 386BSD, but in 1994 migrating to a 4.4BSD-Lite code base. OpenBSD was forked in 1995 from NetBSD. Dec 11, 2016 · I'll answer mainly on Solaris and Linux as I know both intimately. Unfortunately I only have limited experience with FreeBSD or OpenBSD. You'll get an opinionated answer from me. Ubuntu, Linux, OpenBSD, Debian, and FreeNAS are the most popular alternatives and competitors to FreeBSD. "Free to use" is the primary reason why developers choose Ubuntu. For one thing, OpenBSD has a much smaller code base, around 2.9 million lines of code, compared to FreeBSD's roughly 9 million, and NetBSD's 7.3 million. "Obviously this plays a part," van ... Aug 28, 2009 · The -t option triggers a simple and rather naive benchmark of the disks seek and transfer performance, enter: # diskinfo -t /dev/aacd0 Sample Outputs: /dev/aacd0 512 # sectorsize 299573968896 # mediasize in bytes (279G) 585105408 # mediasize in sectors 36421 # Cylinders according to firmware. Stateful packet filtering, Network Address Translation (NAT), port forwarding, passive operating system fingerprinting, packet queueing and Quality of Service, load balancing, and redundant firewalls are available with OpenBSD's PF system. PF is known to be a proven, high-performance, and innovative packet filtering system. Jul 03, 2007 · The PF (packet filter) firewall package was introduced in OpenBSD 3.0, and has since been ported to the FreeBSD and NetBSD Operating Systems. PF contains a stateful packet inspection engine, the ability to replicate state information to a backup firewall, a flexible self optimizing rule engine, QOS support, and the ability to collect performance metrics. Stateful packet filtering, Network Address Translation (NAT), port forwarding, passive operating system fingerprinting, packet queueing and Quality of Service, load balancing, and redundant firewalls are available with OpenBSD's PF system. PF is known to be a proven, high-performance, and innovative packet filtering system. Mar 18, 2015 · One area of performance that OpenBSD tends to be poorer than other OSes though is with regard to SMP performance due to the kernel being biglocked, etc. OpenBSD's hardware support is generally in good shape with the exception of NVIDIA graphics hardware, due to the company not providing any public documentation / no support for the Nouveau DRM ... I use freebsd jails for many admin machines. I haven't tested the performance extensively, but I can tell you that once you get the hang of it, it's great. The time to set up a brand new jail (essentially a new freebsd system) is reduced to a couple minutes or less, with 8 or 9 commands.. and there are scripts to reduce it to one. Ubuntu, Linux, OpenBSD, Debian, and FreeNAS are the most popular alternatives and competitors to FreeBSD. "Free to use" is the primary reason why developers choose Ubuntu. Mar 18, 2015 · One area of performance that OpenBSD tends to be poorer than other OSes though is with regard to SMP performance due to the kernel being biglocked, etc. OpenBSD's hardware support is generally in good shape with the exception of NVIDIA graphics hardware, due to the company not providing any public documentation / no support for the Nouveau DRM ... Nov 19, 2017 · FreeBSD (descendant of Berkeley UNIX) and SmartOS (based on Illumos) aglutinate some features that make administration easier, safer, faster and more reliable. The dream of any systems administrator. To start, the ZFS filesystem combines the typical filesystem with a volume manager. Nov 19, 2017 · FreeBSD (descendant of Berkeley UNIX) and SmartOS (based on Illumos) aglutinate some features that make administration easier, safer, faster and more reliable. The dream of any systems administrator. To start, the ZFS filesystem combines the typical filesystem with a volume manager. The Wikipedia page describes the feelings for FreeBSD 4 thusly: "…widely regarded as one of the most stable and high performance operating systems of the whole Unix lineage." FreeBSD in particular has added other features over time which would appeal to hosting providers, such as jail and ZFS support. Lack of mindshare and optimization for OpenBSD would be my suggestion. I've never heard of anyone running OpenBSD on VMware in the past 6 years. I'd be curious as to why you're planning around OpenBSD, though. The main issues I'd see are memory management and the (lack of) availability of the VMware guest tools for OpenBSD. Some of the famous Linux distributions include Red Hat, Debian, Slackware, Gentoo, Puppy Linux, Solus, etc. Major BSD operating systems are OpenBSD, FreeBSD, and NetBSD. macOS, the operating system of Apple PCs is a closed source operating system of the BSD platform. Linux vs BSD Comparison Table I use freebsd jails for many admin machines. I haven't tested the performance extensively, but I can tell you that once you get the hang of it, it's great. The time to set up a brand new jail (essentially a new freebsd system) is reduced to a couple minutes or less, with 8 or 9 commands.. and there are scripts to reduce it to one. The Wikipedia page describes the feelings for FreeBSD 4 thusly: "…widely regarded as one of the most stable and high performance operating systems of the whole Unix lineage." FreeBSD in particular has added other features over time which would appeal to hosting providers, such as jail and ZFS support. ok me gots a delema here. i want to run the most powerful, fastest and most stable OS for my game server and website (and to learn basic Unix stuff on) the questions that i want answered are: -can FreeBSD run the same things Linux can? by that i mean if i see a thing that says 'Linux... Some of the famous Linux distributions include Red Hat, Debian, Slackware, Gentoo, Puppy Linux, Solus, etc. Major BSD operating systems are OpenBSD, FreeBSD, and NetBSD. macOS, the operating system of Apple PCs is a closed source operating system of the BSD platform. Linux vs BSD Comparison Table Aug 28, 2009 · The -t option triggers a simple and rather naive benchmark of the disks seek and transfer performance, enter: # diskinfo -t /dev/aacd0 Sample Outputs: /dev/aacd0 512 # sectorsize 299573968896 # mediasize in bytes (279G) 585105408 # mediasize in sectors 36421 # Cylinders according to firmware. Nov 19, 2017 · FreeBSD (descendant of Berkeley UNIX) and SmartOS (based on Illumos) aglutinate some features that make administration easier, safer, faster and more reliable. The dream of any systems administrator. To start, the ZFS filesystem combines the typical filesystem with a volume manager. Jan 10, 2019 · Today I want to add another point to my earlier video titled 'Linux is a mess': https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EJEUYUPtNWA I feel like my previous video did... Difference Between Linux vs FreeBSD FreeBSD, like Linux, is a free, open-source and secure Berkeley Software Distributions or BSD operating system that is built on top of Unix operating systems. FreeBSD is one of the most popular operating system distributions of BSD. Xfce took around 15-20 minutes on OpenBSD, compared to around 1-2 minutes on FreeBSD, despite being roughly the same number of meta-packages. I noticed that it kept prompting me about conflicts, which I found kind of annoying. Jan 10, 2019 · Today I want to add another point to my earlier video titled 'Linux is a mess': https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EJEUYUPtNWA I feel like my previous video did... focus. In general FreeBSD is more about 'cutting edge performance', OpenBSD is bugfixing/security, and NetBSD portability. Often the reasons for picking one over another are pretty arbitrary and don't really qualify as 'reasons'.